<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Announces Open-Source DRM Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/131/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/131</link>
	<description>All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MobileRead Networks - Open DRM - DReaM or Nightmare?</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/131#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileRead Networks - Open DRM - DReaM or Nightmare?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/131#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>[...] Open DRM - DReaM or Nightmare?     Sun has announced a project called the &#34;Open Media Commons initiative&#34; to create an open source DRM technology that does not require royalties. They also released their early work from Project DReaM (DRM everywhere available).  Is open source DRM worthy of the &#34;DReaM&#34; name? On the one hand, it could bring universal compatibility across all devices, allowing you to have the appropriate rights to all your content regardless of what device it's on. On the other hand it could be a way for content providers to invade and control your use of their content more than ever.  As DRM technology, it will never approach the compatibility we have now with mp3, no matter how successful. Because regardless of how compatible devices and software becomes, &#34;your&#34; content will still depend on the format. And it's a big challenge for it to become universally accessible on all devices, because that's not something that happens automatically because it's open source or because it comes from Sun. It must be wildly successful to be adopted and supported across the board.   And even if wildly successful, there may be incentive for content owners to push device makers to use alternate DRM technologies anyway, because less compatibility may allow them to sell and re-sell content every time you get a new device, which would not happen with device independent DRM solutions.  On the other hand, even if it's not perfect, industry-wide popularity of DReaM might sure beat the proprietary and device-specific solutions that we may otherwise end up with as the alternative.  It's a tough topic, and we certainly don't have many good answers yet. Trust me, there are a lot of sharp minds working on it. Unfortunately, there's big money at stake, so they might not all have the consumer's best interests at heart.  So we fall back on the position that is so inevitable on many future technology issues - &#34;Time will tell.&#34;  Related Links... * Sun Announces Open-Source DRM Project * Do we need an open source DRM? * Reasons to Love Open-Source DRM *  DRM - a hot topic around the web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open DRM - DReaM or Nightmare?     Sun has announced a project called the &quot;Open Media Commons initiative&quot; to create an open source DRM technology that does not require royalties. They also released their early work from Project DReaM (DRM everywhere available).  Is open source DRM worthy of the &quot;DReaM&quot; name? On the one hand, it could bring universal compatibility across all devices, allowing you to have the appropriate rights to all your content regardless of what device it&#8217;s on. On the other hand it could be a way for content providers to invade and control your use of their content more than ever.  As DRM technology, it will never approach the compatibility we have now with mp3, no matter how successful. Because regardless of how compatible devices and software becomes, &quot;your&quot; content will still depend on the format. And it&#8217;s a big challenge for it to become universally accessible on all devices, because that&#8217;s not something that happens automatically because it&#8217;s open source or because it comes from Sun. It must be wildly successful to be adopted and supported across the board.   And even if wildly successful, there may be incentive for content owners to push device makers to use alternate DRM technologies anyway, because less compatibility may allow them to sell and re-sell content every time you get a new device, which would not happen with device independent DRM solutions.  On the other hand, even if it&#8217;s not perfect, industry-wide popularity of DReaM might sure beat the proprietary and device-specific solutions that we may otherwise end up with as the alternative.  It&#8217;s a tough topic, and we certainly don&#8217;t have many good answers yet. Trust me, there are a lot of sharp minds working on it. Unfortunately, there&#8217;s big money at stake, so they might not all have the consumer&#8217;s best interests at heart.  So we fall back on the position that is so inevitable on many future technology issues - &quot;Time will tell.&quot;  Related Links&#8230; * Sun Announces Open-Source DRM Project * Do we need an open source DRM? * Reasons to Love Open-Source DRM *  DRM - a hot topic around the web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/131#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/131#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Sun might succeed with this project, but the "open source" nature of the project will simply be a smokescreen for an industry coalition. There's plenty of incentive for big companies to join in and help create a free and open DRM system. But there's no reason for the true Open Source community to get involved, and I seriously doubt there will be any interest at all at the grass roots level. 

People donate their time and effort to work on projects that are cool, useful, interesting, or fun. Open Source DRM is completely uncool, useful only as a business tool, no fun at all, and probably only a little bit interesting.

I don't suspect Sun of bad motives on this, I'll give them the beneift of the doubt. But I hope the whole effort either falls flat or backfires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun might succeed with this project, but the &#8220;open source&#8221; nature of the project will simply be a smokescreen for an industry coalition. There&#8217;s plenty of incentive for big companies to join in and help create a free and open DRM system. But there&#8217;s no reason for the true Open Source community to get involved, and I seriously doubt there will be any interest at all at the grass roots level. </p>
<p>People donate their time and effort to work on projects that are cool, useful, interesting, or fun. Open Source DRM is completely uncool, useful only as a business tool, no fun at all, and probably only a little bit interesting.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t suspect Sun of bad motives on this, I&#8217;ll give them the beneift of the doubt. But I hope the whole effort either falls flat or backfires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
