Comments on: District Court Deemed LizardTech’s DWT Patent Invalid http://www.c10n.info/archives/187 All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:46:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Sachin Garg http://www.c10n.info/archives/187#comment-125 Sachin Garg Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:17:42 +0000 http://www.c10n.info/archives/187#comment-125 I haven't read the patent in detail. What are its implications? Does it effects Jpeg2000, which is also DWT based? I haven’t read the patent in detail. What are its implications?

Does it effects Jpeg2000, which is also DWT based?

]]> By: compress http://www.c10n.info/archives/187#comment-124 compress Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:51:31 +0000 http://www.c10n.info/archives/187#comment-124 It seems that only one claim has been invalidated and that the majority of the patent and the method to create seamless wavelet large images is still valid. The patent is owned from Los Alamos National Lab and licensed to Lizardtech It seems that only one claim has been invalidated and that the majority of the patent and the method to create seamless wavelet large images is still valid. The patent is owned from Los Alamos National Lab and licensed to Lizardtech

]]>