<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JPEG death seems imminent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/416/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/416</link>
	<description>All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nelson (Ron K. LeMans)</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nelson (Ron K. LeMans)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Actually, the supreme court ruling in the us this week offers some hope.

I am not a lawyer, so my understanding may be flawed.

But it sounds as though the court is saying that we must apply the principle of "equity" to damage claims.

I think this destroys companies like Forgent, because they now have to prove that they are losing money due to infringement. Since they have no products, they can't show they are losing money.

Right?

I think....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the supreme court ruling in the us this week offers some hope.</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer, so my understanding may be flawed.</p>
<p>But it sounds as though the court is saying that we must apply the principle of &#8220;equity&#8221; to damage claims.</p>
<p>I think this destroys companies like Forgent, because they now have to prove that they are losing money due to infringement. Since they have no products, they can&#8217;t show they are losing money.</p>
<p>Right?</p>
<p>I think&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-2035</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-2035</guid>
		<description>We will use another format...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will use another format&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcinput &#187; Blog Archive &#187; dcinput daily for Wed 26th April, 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>dcinput &#187; Blog Archive &#187; dcinput daily for Wed 26th April, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/416#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Nelson: &#8220;The use of the JPEG format is becoming so mired in patent snarls that it is quickly becoming an albatross around the necks of any companies doing imaging&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Nelson: &#8220;The use of the JPEG format is becoming so mired in patent snarls that it is quickly becoming an albatross around the necks of any companies doing imaging&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
