The Data Compression News Blog

All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.

Subscribe

Posts: RSS Feed
Comments: RSS Feed

Sponsored Links

Recent Posts

  • Bijective BWT (6 Comments)

    David Scott has written a bijective BWT transform, which brings all the advantages of bijectiveness to BWT based compressors. Among other things, making BWT more suitable for compression-before-encryption and also give (slightly) better compression.

  • Asymmetric Binary System (113 Comments)

    Jarek Duda’s “Asymmetric Binary System” promises to be an alternate to arithmetic coding, having all the advantages, but being much simpler. Matt has coded a PAQ based compressor using ABS for back-end encoding. Update: Andrew Polar has written an alternate implementation of ABS.

  • Precomp: More Compression for your Compressed Files (3 Comments)

    So many of today’s files are already compressed (using old, outdated algorithms) that newer algorithms don’t even get a chance to touch them. Christian Schneider’s Precomp comes to rescue by undoing the harm.

  • On2 Technologies is Hiring

    There aren’t too many companies working on cutting edge codecs, and of those few this one is hiring. Best of luck.

  • China’s AVS Specifications Available (2 Comments)

    Its old news that China has developed their own Advanced Video Standard to avoid high licensing fees. English translation of the standard is now available, along with the IPR policy. Finally something technical that you can get your hands on to feed your appetite.

Will China Play Nice?

Posted by Mark Nelson on 3rd May 2006 | Permanent Link

China produces DVD players at a prodigious rate, and they serve both a rapidly growing internal market and a voracious worldwide export market. They’ve never been happy about the patent royalties imposed on them for the MPEG-2 decoders that must go into those boxes, and in many cases, they have simply not paid them. According to the EE Times, there may be an accord in the works that will insure that finally gets everyone playing on the same game board. Other sources seem to be providing some corroboration.

Of course, the proof will be in the paychecks. Coughing up $US 2.50 per unit on players that sometimes are leaving the country with a price tag of $30 might not be so easy. My personal viewpoint on this is that the Chinese government and industry leaders see these IP charges as a form of 21st century imperialism, and are never going to be happy settling for the terms western governments try to impose. At least not until they have some patent portfolios of their own!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>