<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: JPEG? What&#8217;s that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/422/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/422</link>
	<description>All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft&#8217;s WMP not better than Jpeg 2000? - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/422#comment-38360</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft&#8217;s WMP not better than Jpeg 2000? - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/422#comment-38360</guid>
		<description>A report by MSU concludes that “some one-year old implementations of JPEG 2000 significantly outperform WMPhoto in objective and subjective comparison”. But this is NOT the final word. Bill Crow, program manager for Windows Media Photo, gives an interesting review of this comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report by MSU concludes that “some one-year old implementations of JPEG 2000 significantly outperform WMPhoto in objective and subjective comparison”. But this is NOT the final word. Bill Crow, program manager for Windows Media Photo, gives an interesting review of this comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPEG Not Dead Yet? at Mark Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/422#comment-4841</link>
		<dc:creator>JPEG Not Dead Yet? at Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/422#comment-4841</guid>
		<description>[...] Due to ongoing patent abuse from Forgent and other companies, I&#8217;ve been on record recently predicting the demise of the JPEG format. Big companies like stability, and they don&#8217;t like having to worry about litigation that can come out of nowhere and ding their bottom line. That&#8217;s one reason I think Microsoft&#8217;s new image format has a better future than most people think. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Due to ongoing patent abuse from Forgent and other companies, I&#8217;ve been on record recently predicting the demise of the JPEG format. Big companies like stability, and they don&#8217;t like having to worry about litigation that can come out of nowhere and ding their bottom line. That&#8217;s one reason I think Microsoft&#8217;s new image format has a better future than most people think. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
