<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MatrixView Launches SQZit, Same Mistakes Repeated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/443/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/443</link>
	<description>All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: notmatric</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-87331</link>
		<dc:creator>notmatric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-87331</guid>
		<description>there full of poo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there full of poo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Natarajan</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-38603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand Natarajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-38603</guid>
		<description>A path breaking algo is what is claimed - and all they come up as application is for "ultrasound" bilevel images?!?
They don't provide a demo that enables anyone to test out performance - let alone test results etc. 
I think that Arvind - the inventor should ensure that he puts up atleast a demo/ eval software to let users see what is possible by his claimed "invention"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A path breaking algo is what is claimed - and all they come up as application is for &#8220;ultrasound&#8221; bilevel images?!?<br />
They don&#8217;t provide a demo that enables anyone to test out performance - let alone test results etc.<br />
I think that Arvind - the inventor should ensure that he puts up atleast a demo/ eval software to let users see what is possible by his claimed &#8220;invention&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-26030</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-26030</guid>
		<description>Even if they have anything worth showing, they aren't showing it good enough.

Another question left unanswered is that when they say "3 times faster, 40% savings", &lt;b&gt;which&lt;/b&gt; existing technology are they comparing it with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if they have anything worth showing, they aren&#8217;t showing it good enough.</p>
<p>Another question left unanswered is that when they say &#8220;3 times faster, 40% savings&#8221;, <b>which</b> existing technology are they comparing it with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandman</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-25616</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/443#comment-25616</guid>
		<description>They don't have anything worth showing. So we don't see any results. Simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t have anything worth showing. So we don&#8217;t see any results. Simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

