<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PIGZ: Parallel GZIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/505/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505</link>
	<description>All about the most recent compression techniques, algorithms, patents, products, tools and events.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: amd nvidia benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473239</link>
		<dc:creator>amd nvidia benchmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473239</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;amd nvidia benchmark...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>amd nvidia benchmark&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473163</link>
		<dc:creator>News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473163</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;News...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>News&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artikel-dealer.de</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473154</link>
		<dc:creator>Artikel-dealer.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-473154</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Artikel-dealer.de...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Artikel-dealer.de&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]PIGZ: Parallel GZIP - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-463891</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-463891</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

I've compiled pigz 2.1.6 on AIX 5.3 but it won't decompress gz files larger than 2GB. any idea how to enable large file support when compiling pigz on AIX?? I've not install gnu c compiler in it.. using the stock c compiler from aix.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve compiled pigz 2.1.6 on AIX 5.3 but it won&#8217;t decompress gz files larger than 2GB. any idea how to enable large file support when compiling pigz on AIX?? I&#8217;ve not install gnu c compiler in it.. using the stock c compiler from aix.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmartinez</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-359047</link>
		<dc:creator>rmartinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-359047</guid>
		<description>Just wondering how I can compile pigz "statically" in fedora and then copy it to a Redhat machine - because RH still uses zlib version 1.2 but pigz requires 1.3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering how I can compile pigz &#8220;statically&#8221; in fedora and then copy it to a Redhat machine - because RH still uses zlib version 1.2 but pigz requires 1.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike W</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-356364</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-356364</guid>
		<description>Ignore my last post. 

The download randomly changed the filename to "tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.tar" when it should have been "tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.gz" 

.... go figure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore my last post. </p>
<p>The download randomly changed the filename to &#8220;tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.tar&#8221; when it should have been &#8220;tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.gz&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8230;. go figure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike W</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-356363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-356363</guid>
		<description>You cant extract the resulting .tar file from http://zlib.net/pigz/ on an AIX server.

# tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.tar
tar: 0511-169 A directory checksum error on media; 0 not equal to 72695.
[root@nzaxs22ch-cl] : /opt/pigz

Are there limitations as to what O/S can use this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cant extract the resulting .tar file from <a href="http://zlib.net/pigz/" rel="nofollow">http://zlib.net/pigz/</a> on an AIX server.</p>
<p># tar -xvf pigz-2.1.6.tar.tar<br />
tar: 0511-169 A directory checksum error on media; 0 not equal to 72695.<br />
[root@nzaxs22ch-cl] : /opt/pigz</p>
<p>Are there limitations as to what O/S can use this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-308126</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-308126</guid>
		<description>You will need to compile it yourself (its just code but it should work on windows). 

It will work 2 times faster by using both cores if your CPU is dual core. 4x faster if you have a quad core, but no speed up if you have a single-core CPU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will need to compile it yourself (its just code but it should work on windows). </p>
<p>It will work 2 times faster by using both cores if your CPU is dual core. 4x faster if you have a quad core, but no speed up if you have a single-core CPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-307094</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-307094</guid>
		<description>Does this run on Windows systems?  Is the compression faster than something like gzip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this run on Windows systems?  Is the compression faster than something like gzip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-263805</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-263805</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Thanks. :) Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Thanks. :) Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-263557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-263557</guid>
		<description>Version 2.0 of the parallel implementation of gzip called "pigz" is 
available here:

    http://zlib.net/pigz/

pigz exploits multiple processors and multiple cores for compression. 
The use of threads has been completely rewritten to be more efficient 
and clean.  It compiles on Unixish operating systems that provide the 
zlib and pthread libraries.

If you have success or failure in compiling and using pigz, I would 
appreciate knowing about either way.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 2.0 of the parallel implementation of gzip called &#8220;pigz&#8221; is<br />
available here:</p>
<p>    <a href="http://zlib.net/pigz/" rel="nofollow">http://zlib.net/pigz/</a></p>
<p>pigz exploits multiple processors and multiple cores for compression.<br />
The use of threads has been completely rewritten to be more efficient<br />
and clean.  It compiles on Unixish operating systems that provide the<br />
zlib and pthread libraries.</p>
<p>If you have success or failure in compiling and using pigz, I would<br />
appreciate knowing about either way.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Colby Pottinger</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-248617</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Colby Pottinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-248617</guid>
		<description>Girlfriend:  What is your hardware/software setup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girlfriend:  What is your hardware/software setup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-248186</link>
		<dc:creator>girlfriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-248186</guid>
		<description>According to my personal benchmarks, pigz doesn't speed up compression, unlike pbzip. In fact, in some cases it's performance may be slower than single-threaded version!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to my personal benchmarks, pigz doesn&#8217;t speed up compression, unlike pbzip. In fact, in some cases it&#8217;s performance may be slower than single-threaded version!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Polar</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-235905</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Polar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-235905</guid>
		<description>I wish to use this opportunity and ask Mark Adler a question. In 1990 Martucci published article regarding usage of simple predictor in combination with entropy encoder for compression of images. Following this article it is possible to write image compression routine of 300 lines that makes photo images to be compressed as 2.5 to 1. Three years later PNG format was created that required 20 times longer code and compressed photo images typically as 1.7 to 1. PNG format happened to be incorporated into major browsers. 16 years after mentioned publication Microsoft introduced HD Photo that compress images to the same ratio as in Marucci method published in 1990. And few years ago JPEG2000 anounced format that is about 7% better than Martucci suggested in 1990. The question is
Wouldn't that be nice to incorporate new format into all browsers that require 300 lines of coding, so programmers will be able to generate images on the fly in web applications without using so called new approach of Microsoft that is called Silverlight.
Thanks,
Andrew Polar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to use this opportunity and ask Mark Adler a question. In 1990 Martucci published article regarding usage of simple predictor in combination with entropy encoder for compression of images. Following this article it is possible to write image compression routine of 300 lines that makes photo images to be compressed as 2.5 to 1. Three years later PNG format was created that required 20 times longer code and compressed photo images typically as 1.7 to 1. PNG format happened to be incorporated into major browsers. 16 years after mentioned publication Microsoft introduced HD Photo that compress images to the same ratio as in Marucci method published in 1990. And few years ago JPEG2000 anounced format that is about 7% better than Martucci suggested in 1990. The question is<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t that be nice to incorporate new format into all browsers that require 300 lines of coding, so programmers will be able to generate images on the fly in web applications without using so called new approach of Microsoft that is called Silverlight.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Andrew Polar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-235843</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c10n.info/archives/505#comment-235843</guid>
		<description>Just use the link to version 1.7, its in the comment above yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just use the link to version 1.7, its in the comment above yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

